Worksheet · Analytics

Benchmark your OnlyFans growth against your own baseline.

Public averages hide differences in niche, audience, price and starting point. This worksheet gives you a repeatable baseline from the account data you can actually verify.

Visual summary of the Jaded MGMT matched-period OnlyFans growth worksheet

Free CSV template

Record one definition consistently, then compare matched periods.

The download contains the exact columns used in this method. It has no invented industry averages, macros or account integrations, so you can inspect it before adding any private account data.

Worksheet v1.1 · Updated September 2, 2026. The CSV downloads to your device. Jaded does not receive the values you enter; consent-gated analytics may record only that the file was downloaded.

Download the worksheet

Use matched periods

Compare the same number of days and, where possible, the same weekdays. Record launches, promotions, price changes and outages so a one-off event is not mistaken for normal growth.

Use net numbers consistently

Decide whether the sheet uses fan spend, creator gross or creator net, then keep that definition unchanged. OnlyFans' standard platform split is explained in our payouts and fees guide.

Four metrics for a useful baseline

Exact definitions depend on the data available in your account and promotion tools. Write the definition beside the number so future comparisons stay compatible.

MetricFormulaWhat it diagnoses
Qualified visitsTracked visits from each promotion sourceShows which channels send people who actually reach your page or link hub.
Subscriber conversionNew paid subscribers ÷ qualified visitsSeparates a traffic problem from a profile, offer or expectation problem.
Renewal rateRenewed subscriptions ÷ subscriptions eligible to renewShows whether the page is delivering enough ongoing value to retain fans.
Net revenue per active fanCreator net revenue ÷ active paying fansKeeps subscription, PPV, tips and paid messaging connected to the audience size.

Field and definition checklist

The template includes worksheet and definition versions, period labels and dates, period length, currency, source, campaign or content change, each raw metric, formula outputs, the exact report reference, exclusions, data gaps, and notes.

Review weekly for operations, but avoid calling a trend from one short window. The smaller the account, the longer it may take to collect a stable comparison.

CSV fieldDefinition
worksheet_versionTemplate release used for the row; currently 1.1.
definition_versionYour own frozen definition set, so later periods use the same rules.
period_labelA human label such as baseline, comparison, or week 3.
period_start / period_end / period_daysInclusive date window and its calculated length.
currencyThe single currency used for every money field in the row.
sourceThe promotion, platform, or cohort being evaluated.
campaign_or_changeThe intervention or material operating change during the period.
qualified_visitsVisits meeting your written eligibility rule; keep the tracking source consistent.
new_paid_subscribersNew paid subscribers attributed under the same rule and window.
subscriber_conversion_rateCalculated as new paid subscribers divided by qualified visits.
renewals_eligible / renewals_completedThe defined renewal denominator and the completed renewals within it.
renewal_rateCalculated as completed renewals divided by eligible renewals.
active_paying_fansFans counted under one written active-paying definition for the period.
creator_net_revenueThe creator-net amount after the deductions included in your definition.
net_revenue_per_active_fanCalculated as creator net revenue divided by active paying fans.
source_or_report_referenceThe exact export, report, tracker, or statement behind the row.
exclusions_or_data_gapsMissing data, outages, exclusions, or known tracking limitations.
notesContext that affects interpretation but does not belong in a metric field.

Worked interpretation

Three fictional outcomes—and three different decisions.

These scenarios contain no creator data and are not expected ranges. They show why several metrics and context notes need to be read together.

Fictional scenario 1

Quality improved

Qualified visits stayed similar while subscriber conversion, renewal rate, and creator net revenue per active fan increased.

Next decision: Investigate which offer, audience, or retention change is repeatable before assigning causation.

Fictional scenario 2

Volume rose, monetization weakened

Qualified visits and new subscribers increased while net revenue per active fan and renewal rate declined.

Next decision: Check traffic quality, offer fit, discounting, content delivery, and cohort mix before celebrating reach alone.

Fictional scenario 3

Inconclusive or noisy

A launch, outage, pricing change, or very small denominator affected one period, so the windows are not comparable.

Next decision: Record the confounder and collect another matched period instead of forcing a winner.

Method

A comparison is useful only when the definitions stay stable.

This is a first-party operating worksheet, not a promise of typical earnings. The comparison becomes more useful as you collect longer, cleaner periods from the same sources.

  1. 1

    Define the inputs

    Write down what counts as a qualified visit, active fan and creator net revenue before entering the first period.

  2. 2

    Capture the source

    Record the platform report, link tracker or account export behind every number so another reviewer can reproduce it.

  3. 3

    Annotate interventions

    Log promotions, price changes, outages and major content launches instead of crediting every movement to the latest tactic.

  4. 4

    Compare matched windows

    Use the same number of days and similar weekdays. Small accounts may need longer windows before a pattern is stable.

  5. 5

    Make one decision

    Use the result to choose the next bottleneck—traffic, conversion, retention or revenue per fan—then measure that change separately.

Method owner: Jaded MGMT Editorial Team. This worksheet has not been independently reviewed and is not a public dataset. Read the full research methodology or browse all free creator resources.
Start with the baseline

Want a second set of eyes on your funnel?

Apply for a no-pressure account review. We'll start with the numbers and constraints you actually have — not a universal earnings promise.

We onboard a limited number of new creators each month.

Get your free audit + plan

Free · no commitment · takes about 2 minutes.

  • No lock-in contracts
  • You stay in control
  • Discreet & confidential